Science fairs are not what they used to be.
May 18, 2008
Science Reporter
OTTAWA–There never were any vinegar-and-baking-soda volcanoes at science fairs, at least not once you got past the individual schools to the city-wide and regional levels. Those volcanoes were merely a canard perpetuated by TV sitcoms and a few journalists who wouldn't know an acid from a base.
But there were aquaria brimming with swimming denizens, hamsters spinning wheels, Petri dishes harbouring fungi and moulds, electrical gizmos that generated satisfying sparks, plus liquids that foamed and changed colour when poured.
Alas, gone, all gone. Four and a half decades has transformed science fairs in ways both distressing and invigorating to an exhibitor whose first-hand experience dates from the early 1960s.
No longer is a science fair a showplace for bright youngsters to demonstrate actual experiments. Instead, judging from hours spent walking the aisles at the Canada-Wide Science Fair in Ottawa last week, today's participants are largely reduced to screening laptop videos of those experiments.
Organizers say they've had little choice but to strip away most of the fun from exhibiting at science fairs because of concerns over legal liability, animal rights, allergic reactions, fire regulations, litigious parents, and the Nanny State attitude in North American society that has reduced chemistry sets to a box of innocuous substances.
The danger is that such preoccupations might also have robbed science-fair projects of their hallmark zest and their penchant for venturing into the unknown.
I am relieved to report that this is not the case. The gymnasium floor at the University of Ottawa overflowed with hundreds of personable teens, whose inquiring minds are actively involved in real-life matters affecting their family, their peer group, their community and the world at large. Here are a few inspiring examples:
Deciding that ceramics raised too many production questions, they focused on making pavers and stepping stones. The two 15-year-olds went through a trial-and-error process that led to a suitable recipe: one part tailings, one part coarse sand, and two parts Portland cement. The air-cured result was certified by the concrete testing lab at Northern College.
There were dozens more projects attesting to the curiosity and ingenuity of today's teens: a self-levelling falcon kite from Kelsey Mostertman, 13, of Abbotsford B.C., to scare away starlings that devour blueberry crops; a low-tech, one-person Zamboni for outdoor rinks, conceived and constructed by Mike Gorda, 13, of North Bay; comprehensive experiments by Quinte Grade 7 student Corey Morrison demonstrating that orange-coloured pucks would substantially increase saves by goalies.
The Canada-Wide Science Fair provided welcome testimony to the true spirit of scientific inquiry and a poignant reminder of how far some science has strayed from it. Much of adult research today involves massive teams instead of inspired individuals, the "salami science" of publishing the smallest slice possible to maximize citations and even instances of the misappropriation of public funds with federal granting agencies hiding the identity of the wrong-doers.
Teenage science has also travelled light years since my fairs in 1960 and 1961. My examination as a 16-year-old of the internal structure of gastropods (the snail family) looks lame in comparison to the profound questions being tackled now by 13-year-olds.
For the fair the following year, I and two fellow Grade 13 students passed high-voltage current through ordinary table salt inside a refractory brick furnace to separate the constituent elements of chlorine and sodium, one poisonous and the other explosive.
It's a safe bet that no high school would allow its students to do anything similar today. Today's science-fair organizers blanched at the mere description. Yet no harm ensued and the others wound up as an orthodontist and a rubber chemist. It could be unwise to banish all edgy research from science fair projects.